Christian professor who criticized DEI wins battle for tenure at Michigan State U.


Internal documents reveal how administrators use “diversity checks” to influence the hiring process and engage in discrimination.


The College Fix

By Pedro Rodriguez-Aparicio

July 11, 2025


Civil rights group says school violated professor’s First Amendment rights


An accomplished nematologist now has tenure at Michigan State University after initially being passed over following her criticism of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.”


Professor Marisol Quintanilla recently won tenure from the public university in Lansing after intervention from the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism.


The civil rights group intervened after Quintanilla (pictured) failed to obtain tenure despite two decades of teaching experience and “21 peer-reviewed publications, over $6.2 million in grants, and 189 extension talks,” according to a news release.


The group argued in a January letter that the school discriminated against Quintanilla after she faced backlash in 2022 for criticizing DEI policies. She also declined to list her gender on university forms, “believing these questions implicitly endorsed ideological positions contrary to her faith.”


“FAIR’s advocacy for Dr. Marisol Quintanilla reflects our core commitment to protecting academic freedom and ensuring that faculty members can express their deeply held convictions without facing professional retaliation,” a spokesperson for the non-profit told The College Fix.


Michigan State U. said the letter did not lead to tenure.


“A letter from any outside organization would have no bearing on the review process,” spokeswoman Amber McCann told The Fix via email.

“Each submission for reappointment, promotion and tenure (RPT) review is considered on the merits of the case, according to university policy and procedure,” McCann said.


A free speech group who previously helped Professor Quintanilla called the resolution a “positive outcome.”


“The university cannot dictate a professor’s speech. It is a positive outcome that the university reversed course and offered the professor tenure,” Graham Piro with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression told The Fix on a phone call.


In 2023, the group helped Quintanilla when her department chair, Hannah Burrack, mandated the professor “write a DEI statement as part of her annual review.” Burrack also had asked Quintanilla to retract an article criticizing diversity initiatives.


The College Fix contacted Burrack via email on Thursday morning to ask for her side of the story, but she deferred to McCann, the university spokeswoman. She said DEI statements are not required for performance reviews.


Piro said the university did not act in alignment with previous court decisions, where courts sided with people who chose not to disclose their gender identities.


“It is worth noting that there is a decision from a 2006 Circuit Court of Appeals that was a violation of the professors first amendment right and expression of religion,” Piro told The Fix on behalf of the free speech group. “The court believed that addressing the student by their identity fell on the ideological side.”


“If there is a blanket requirement of the preferred pronouns it would be an infringement of the First Amendment right,” Piro said.

“Universities have the right to limit faculty speech in a particular way but a generic requirement that dictates how a faculty is addressed would not be allowed.”



October 8, 2025
Cornell and George Mason have allegedly violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
October 7, 2025
The Daily Signal By Hannah Fay October 07, 2025 "On Sept. 5, we filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Education and the Department of Justice against our alma mater, Davidson College. We did not make this decision out of anger towards Davidson but from our hope that Davidson can become an institution of free expression that encourages students to pursue truth. We had chosen Davidson as student athletes and recall being high school seniors, eager to attend a college where we could simultaneously pursue a high level of athletics and academics and be challenged to become better competitors, students and, most importantly, people. We believed that Davidson would be the perfect place for our personal growth, where we would be encouraged to encounter new ideas while contributing our own. Little did we know that Davidson does not welcome students with our convictions . During our senior year, we decided to restart the Davidson chapter of Young Americans for Freedom, a national conservative student organization, which had been disbanded. With this decision, we knew that we would receive backlash from peers. Before the school semester even started, we received hateful online comments such as “Who let y’all out of the basement?” We saw how other universities treated conservatives and had even experienced hostility firsthand at Davidson, being called “homophobic” or “uninclusive” for our involvement in Fellowship of Christian Athletes, whose statement of faith declares that marriage is between a man and a woman. We realized that, although we were friends with progressive individuals for the past few years, fully aware and accepting of their political beliefs, they would likely distance themselves from us once they learned of ours. While we were prepared for this reaction from our peers, we did not expect to receive such opposition from Davidson administrators. We naively believed that despite the college’s leftist indoctrination efforts (requiring cultural diversity courses, mandating student athletics to watch a documentary arguing that all white people were inherently racist, having a DEI office, designating secluded spaces for LGBTQ+ students, etc.), they would still surely encourage free speech. After all, a liberal arts institution should cultivate a space where students can freely inquire, peacefully debate, and form decisions for themselves. Before the semester even began, we faced resistance from the administration as we could not get approval to restart the club from the Director of Student Activities Emily Eisenstadt for three weeks after a follow-up email and a faculty advisor request. Other conservative organizations also faced irresponsiveness from the Director of Student Activities. However, when leftist groups wanted to bring Gavin Newsom to campus, they had no problem getting a swift response. Despite continued administrative opposition, we hosted speakers, including pro-life activist Abby Johnson and President Ronald Reagan’s economic advisor Arthur Laffer; organized events such as the 9/11 “Never Forget”; and attempted to engage in civil conversations about abortion. Our efforts even led to us being awarded “Chapter Rookie of the Year” by Young America’s Foundation. Our most notable event, and the reason for our complaint, was our “Stand with Israel” project, in which we placed 1,195 Israeli flags into the ground to memorialize the innocent victims of the Oct. 7 Massacre by Hamas. We also laid out pamphlets on tables in the library and student union titled, “The Five Myths About Israel Perpetrated by the Pro-Hamas Left,” provided to us by Young America’s Foundation. This event led to two significant outcomes. First, our flags were stolen overnight. When we brought this to the attention of Davidson administrators and the Honor Council, they dismissed the case and chose not to investigate, despite their so-called commitment to the Honor Code. Second, on Feb. 26, 2025, over four months after the event, we received an email from Director of Rights and Responsibilities Mak Thompkins informing us that we faced charges of “violating” the Code of Responsibility. We had allegedly made students feel “threatened and unsafe” due to our distribution of pamphlets that allegedly promoted “Islamophobia.” This was ironic to us, given that we did not even know who our accusers were, let alone not ever having interacted with them. What’s more, we knew of Jewish students who genuinely felt targeted because of the rampant antisemitism on our campus. For example, a massive Palestine flag was hung across our main academic building the day after President Donald Trump won the election, and the student group ‘Cats Against Imperialism’—Davidson’s college moniker is “Wildcats”—distributed pamphlets promoting their aggressive pro-Palestinian agenda. Yet, unlike us, they faced no consequences. Davidson’s biased treatment towards pro-Israel students led to our filing a civil rights complaint with the DOJ and Department of Education. Davidson College must be held accountable for its blatant discrimination and violation of Title VI and Title IX ; it should not receive any federal funding until it complies with the federal law. In light of the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, it is now more important than ever that higher education promotes free expression. Colleges and universities are predominantly controlled by leftists who demonize conservatives and the values we stand for. If Davidson cannot commit to shaping students who understand the equal dignity of every person made in the image of God, regardless of religion, it risks corrupting individuals and prompting them to support, or even commit, acts of political violence. We hope that Davidson will become a community that values all perspectives and treats all students with dignity and respect, including the Jewish population. Though we are not of Jewish descent, we strongly support Israel and the Jewish people and faced discrimination based on the content of our support. If we had, as our counterparts did, expressed antisemitism, Davidson officials would have treated us differently. Hannah Fay is a communications fellow for media and public relations at The Heritage Foundation.
September 21, 2025
Evidence Backs Trump on Higher Ed’s Bias
Show More