The Great Grade Giveaway


You get an A! And you get an A! On campuses this fall, some students might feel like they’ve wandered into their own Oprah episode, except the prize is a transcript filled with top marks.


The Daily Signal

By Madison Marino Doan 

August 19, 2025


You get an A! And you get an A! On campuses this fall, some students might feel like they’ve wandered into their own Oprah episode, except the prize is a transcript filled with top marks.


For decades, the share of As has been swelling like a balloon. At Harvard, nearly 80% of grades in the 2020-2021 school year were in the “A” range. Back in 2001, Harvard professor Harvey Mansfield called this out, warning that grade inflation “devalues the currency of the academic realm” and turns grades into “worthless tokens of self-esteem.” Two decades later, his point is looking uncomfortably prophetic.

Why the flood of top grades?


Partly, it may be the erosion of core curriculum requirements. The American Council of Trustees and Alumni recently found that fewer than 20% of colleges require a U.S. government or history course. Not only that, but of the 1,100 institutions reviewed, less than a third mandate literature. Without foundational skills, students may shy away from harder classes, and schools, eager to keep them enrolled, may make the easy ones easier still.


Scholar George Leef has another explanation: the rise of the “consumer culture” in higher education. He points out that students increasingly see themselves as “buying” a degree, and that the rapid expansion of colleges and universities over the last 50 years has left many schools “extremely hungry for students” and more focused on maintaining enrollment than on upholding academic standards.


The numbers tell the story.


2011 study found that in 1960, only 15% of all college grades were A’s; they were outnumbered by both D’s and F’s combined, and the most common grade was a C. By 2013, the most common grade was an A (43%), and A’s and B’s accounted for almost three-fourths of all grades at public institutions and 86% of grades at private ones.


Another study based on 40 years of student survey data found that in 1969, only 7% of students said that they had an A grade-point average or higher, but by 2009, that figure had risen to 41%. 


Some schools are pushing back.


Dartmouth, Columbia, and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have adopted measures to indicate what a grade means in a given course, such as listing the average or median grade, or the percentage of the class receiving that grade, alongside the student’s grade on the transcript.


Texas lawmakers have proposed “Honest Transcript” legislation, requiring public universities to display course-wide grade averages next to individual grades (with exceptions for courses with 10 or fewer students) and grade independent study courses as pass or fail. The measure passed the state’s House but stalled in the Senate.


Even student leaders have gotten involved, with six student body presidents representing more than 200,000 students urging President Donald Trump to require, via executive order, all Title IV universities to include the median (or average) grade for each class on students’ transcripts.


“Higher education commits academic dishonesty,” they wrote, “by treating a hard-earned A in a challenging course the same as an easy A in a remedial class.”


Restoring rigor isn’t just about fairness to high achievers. It’s about preserving the value of a college degree. Honest transcript policies won’t solve grade inflation overnight, but they would shine light into the system, curb inflationary pressure, and help employers and graduate programs tell the difference between an outstanding student and an average one with a transcript full of A’s.


If we want to restore confidence in higher education, it’s time to trade in the fanfare for a little more honesty and a lot more accountability.


https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/08/19/great-grade-giveaway/



October 8, 2025
Cornell and George Mason have allegedly violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
October 7, 2025
The Daily Signal By Hannah Fay October 07, 2025 "On Sept. 5, we filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Education and the Department of Justice against our alma mater, Davidson College. We did not make this decision out of anger towards Davidson but from our hope that Davidson can become an institution of free expression that encourages students to pursue truth. We had chosen Davidson as student athletes and recall being high school seniors, eager to attend a college where we could simultaneously pursue a high level of athletics and academics and be challenged to become better competitors, students and, most importantly, people. We believed that Davidson would be the perfect place for our personal growth, where we would be encouraged to encounter new ideas while contributing our own. Little did we know that Davidson does not welcome students with our convictions . During our senior year, we decided to restart the Davidson chapter of Young Americans for Freedom, a national conservative student organization, which had been disbanded. With this decision, we knew that we would receive backlash from peers. Before the school semester even started, we received hateful online comments such as “Who let y’all out of the basement?” We saw how other universities treated conservatives and had even experienced hostility firsthand at Davidson, being called “homophobic” or “uninclusive” for our involvement in Fellowship of Christian Athletes, whose statement of faith declares that marriage is between a man and a woman. We realized that, although we were friends with progressive individuals for the past few years, fully aware and accepting of their political beliefs, they would likely distance themselves from us once they learned of ours. While we were prepared for this reaction from our peers, we did not expect to receive such opposition from Davidson administrators. We naively believed that despite the college’s leftist indoctrination efforts (requiring cultural diversity courses, mandating student athletics to watch a documentary arguing that all white people were inherently racist, having a DEI office, designating secluded spaces for LGBTQ+ students, etc.), they would still surely encourage free speech. After all, a liberal arts institution should cultivate a space where students can freely inquire, peacefully debate, and form decisions for themselves. Before the semester even began, we faced resistance from the administration as we could not get approval to restart the club from the Director of Student Activities Emily Eisenstadt for three weeks after a follow-up email and a faculty advisor request. Other conservative organizations also faced irresponsiveness from the Director of Student Activities. However, when leftist groups wanted to bring Gavin Newsom to campus, they had no problem getting a swift response. Despite continued administrative opposition, we hosted speakers, including pro-life activist Abby Johnson and President Ronald Reagan’s economic advisor Arthur Laffer; organized events such as the 9/11 “Never Forget”; and attempted to engage in civil conversations about abortion. Our efforts even led to us being awarded “Chapter Rookie of the Year” by Young America’s Foundation. Our most notable event, and the reason for our complaint, was our “Stand with Israel” project, in which we placed 1,195 Israeli flags into the ground to memorialize the innocent victims of the Oct. 7 Massacre by Hamas. We also laid out pamphlets on tables in the library and student union titled, “The Five Myths About Israel Perpetrated by the Pro-Hamas Left,” provided to us by Young America’s Foundation. This event led to two significant outcomes. First, our flags were stolen overnight. When we brought this to the attention of Davidson administrators and the Honor Council, they dismissed the case and chose not to investigate, despite their so-called commitment to the Honor Code. Second, on Feb. 26, 2025, over four months after the event, we received an email from Director of Rights and Responsibilities Mak Thompkins informing us that we faced charges of “violating” the Code of Responsibility. We had allegedly made students feel “threatened and unsafe” due to our distribution of pamphlets that allegedly promoted “Islamophobia.” This was ironic to us, given that we did not even know who our accusers were, let alone not ever having interacted with them. What’s more, we knew of Jewish students who genuinely felt targeted because of the rampant antisemitism on our campus. For example, a massive Palestine flag was hung across our main academic building the day after President Donald Trump won the election, and the student group ‘Cats Against Imperialism’—Davidson’s college moniker is “Wildcats”—distributed pamphlets promoting their aggressive pro-Palestinian agenda. Yet, unlike us, they faced no consequences. Davidson’s biased treatment towards pro-Israel students led to our filing a civil rights complaint with the DOJ and Department of Education. Davidson College must be held accountable for its blatant discrimination and violation of Title VI and Title IX ; it should not receive any federal funding until it complies with the federal law. In light of the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, it is now more important than ever that higher education promotes free expression. Colleges and universities are predominantly controlled by leftists who demonize conservatives and the values we stand for. If Davidson cannot commit to shaping students who understand the equal dignity of every person made in the image of God, regardless of religion, it risks corrupting individuals and prompting them to support, or even commit, acts of political violence. We hope that Davidson will become a community that values all perspectives and treats all students with dignity and respect, including the Jewish population. Though we are not of Jewish descent, we strongly support Israel and the Jewish people and faced discrimination based on the content of our support. If we had, as our counterparts did, expressed antisemitism, Davidson officials would have treated us differently. Hannah Fay is a communications fellow for media and public relations at The Heritage Foundation.
September 21, 2025
Evidence Backs Trump on Higher Ed’s Bias
Show More